Bruno Fagali Reveals Why The Court Determined For Beer Labels To Include Every Cereal Utilized

Bruno Fagali illustrates his views on recent judgments made on beer labels, beginning with the example of taking a glance at the tag of your beer and questioning why it includes unmalted cereals on the label. As is usually the case, a person who believes he or she is the best versed in the matter answers by declaring that it is a brew formed not only by part water hops and part barley malt but also made of unmalted cereals. At maximum, this person reveals that these unmalted foods can be: corn, rice, oats, soy, sorghum or even the most varied of unions among them.

It’s now good to hear that according to a judgment determined by Federal Judge Juliano Taveira Bernardes (from the Fourth Court of the Judicial Branch of the State of Golas) you will no longer need to withstand this uncertainty, Fagali noted

Read more: O cigarro no banco dos réus: no Brasil, os aditivos; nos Estados Unidos, os advertisings


In July 2016, the Public Prosecutor’s Office finished a public civil case with an admonition, in the presence of the four major distributors by the determined by the Federal Government, among other things, that in sixty days all beers manufactured and/or advertised by the brewers must display on their tag the reports of which specific unmalted cereals were utilized in their brewing.

The federal judge decided that up to a maximum of 120 days after determining the judgment, they are obligated to advertise their brews with labels specifying exactly which unmalted cereals were handled in their distribution, Bruno Fagali stated on terra.com.br. Whether or not we came to the same results viewing the order, the point of the matter remains that the evidence is extremely well established. The federal judge has inquired and illustrated the proceedings awfully well and the understanding of the pivotal issues encompassing the incident including: does the CDC demand that this knowledge is represented on the beer label? Do the Laws and Decrees expect this? And – would such a requirement be unreasonable?

Professional in Administrative Law by FGV and PUC, Fagali accommodates a master’s diploma in State Law from USP and his expert knowledge is concentrated on governing law concentrated in the field of ​Public Administration restraint (markedly in the opposition of acts of administrative indecency). Fagali works as corporate integrity manager at Nova/SB. He founded his own law firm, Fagali Advocacy.

Learn more about Bruno Fagali: https://www3.ethos.org.br/cedoc/gerente-de-integridade-da-novasb-comenta-caminhos-para-conquistar-o-pro-etica/#.WrAnfpPwZTY

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *